--- /dev/null
+So this is my outline plan, including the things we discussed on IRC
+yesterday ...
+
+> > https://pretalx.com/devconf-cz-2024/talk/Q7XB3M/
+
+> * One slide timeline of the project, showing start and major
+> milestones. Just show, don't talk about it.
+
+[David]
+
+> Talk is fine, but it's too easy to overspend time here. Probably:
+> - When we started, and re-started (after glibc ABI stabilization).
+> - All historical (archival bits are available) from day 1.
+> - Koji setup (libvirt up to 180 VMs in GCC Compiler Farm).
+> - New Koji setup with SiFive HiFive Unmatched boards (thanks SiFive and WDC
+> mainly).
+> - Boards hosted by the community (not many).
+> - Now Koji is in AWS, Fedora infra managed resources (well, one VM).
+> - Pioneer connected (thanks RVI).
+> - VF2 is pending to be connected after new disk images are prepared (thanks
+> StarFive).
+
+Personally I'd just sum this up in a diagram on one slide, and not
+even talk about it. Something like:
+
+ --- 2016 project starts
+ |
+ |
+ --- 2018 HiFive Unleashed
+ |
+ |
+ etc
+ |
+ --- 2024 Fedora 41
+
+> * Current status - Fedora 40 & Fedora 41 status. What boards are
+> supported and/or recommended.
+
+[David]
+
+> Unmatched what Fedora mainly uses (same with Debian too).
+> VF2 is about to enter the game basically.
+> I would expect ESWIN/SiFive P550 boards to quickly join a list.
+>
+> * Commercial interest in RISC-V. The current companies developing
+> RISC-V hardware (as far as we can reveal). Might stick to server
+> hardware, since talking about _all_ the companies doing RISC-V could
+> be impossible.
+
+[David]
+
+> SiFive, T-HEAD, Rivos, Ventana, Tenstorrent?
+> Well these are the validated or kinda trusted folks. SupermiT claims server
+> stuff with their X100, but a lot is unknown.
+
+
+> * RVI and RISE.
+
+[Richard]
+
+Slide: RISC-V International (RVI)
+
+https://riscv.org/
+
+Slide: Members page
+
+https://riscv.org/members/
+
+Red Hat is a member of RVI through our parent company, IBM.
+Fedora is not directly a member.
+
+Slide: RISC-V groups
+
+https://tech.riscv.org/groups
+
+The range of things that RVI does is enormous, but to summarise
+this, it's steering the hardware and ISA standards and general
+collaboration.
+
+Slide: RISE
+
+https://riseproject.dev/
+
+Red Hat is directly a member. We contribute 2 full time engineer
+equivalent people to the project.
+
+Slide: RISE TSCs
+
+(lower down same page)
+
+RISE tends to concentrate more at the software level, filling in
+gaps in the software and working with Linux distributions.
+
+
+
+
+> Yes. One is handling open source standards, and collaboration in
+> general. Another one is to fill the gaps in the software and avoid
+> duplicated expensive development. We should show an up-to-date list
+> of the companies in RISE. It has grown:
+> https://wiki.riseproject.dev/display/HOME/About+RISE
+
+
+> * Profiles. Tension between supporting future hardware and what is
+> currently available for developers.
+
+[Richard]
+
+Slide: Profiles SIG
+
+https://jira.riscv.org/browse/RVG-156?src=confmacro
+or https://lists.riscv.org/g/sig-profiles
+
+I don't want to go deeply into RISC-V and extensions. I wrote
+an article about this recently for Red Hat Research Quarterly if
+you're interested in finding out more.
+
+Slide: RVA23
+
+But an important effort in RISC-V is grouping certain hardware
+features into mandatory and optional layers which are called
+"profiles".
+
+The mandatory part of the standard includes:
+
+ - vector extension
+ - hypervisor extension
+ - hardware performance counters
+ - cache coherence
+ - "maybe" operations
+ - page-based memory types
+ - fine-grained TLB invalidation
+ - 39-bit virtual memory
+
+Optional extensions include:
+
+ - vector crypto
+ - byte, halfword atomic ops
+ - FP16
+ - 48- and 57-bit virtual memory
+ - raising exception on unimplemented opcodes (controversial!)
+
+Slide: RVA24
+
+Under discussion!
+
+New naming scheme.
+
+> Yes.
+> This is a complicated topic, and I am not fully up to date.
+> RVA 23/24, minor/major.
+> New naming scheme being discussed?
+> Note that deprecating extensions is kinda fine. We should talk about this being
+> a possibility.
+>
+> You are more likely up to date with this.
+
+
+> * CentOS Stream 10 work. The path from Fedora 40 -> CS10. How
+> changes have to go upstream first.
+
+[Richard]
+
+Slide: Diagram showing downstream -> upstream -> F40 -> CS10 relationships
+ Students in China, David, etc.
+
+> Yes.
+> We basically want this ASAP, but we have done very minimal effort so far.
+>
+> * New Koji hub instance, integration with FAS so any Fedora packager
+> can build.
+
+[Richard, input from Kevin]
+
+Slide: Screenshot of current Koji
+
+We're building a new Koji hub.
+
+Not the same as Fedora Koji (yet).
+
+Will be accessible by any Fedora packager, but might need pre-approval.
+
+Will automatically rebuild most Fedora packages, but doesn't block them.
+
+> Yes.
+> I don't think we have all the answers here, but maybe Kevin does.
+> TLDR; We will have a new Koji (still separate), but much closer to the existing
+> setup with FAS integration, and some form of koji-shadow.
+>
+>
+> * Future plans for RISC-V as a primary architecture.
+
+[Richard]
+
+Slide: RISC-V as a primary Fedora architecture
+
+This is our long term goal.
+
+We're possibly talking about Fedora 42, but nothing has been decided.
+
+It requires better hardware to be available, especially higher end
+development boards and maybe server hardware.
+
+
+
+
+> Yes.
+> Nothing to hide, we are going for the 1st tier (primary) architecture support.
+> It's mainly blocked by proper server hardware availability.
+> Some things we should mention:
+> - Symlink hack we had, and that some folks will not like it.
+> - Potential of a new ABI if things move towards that direction.
+
+Rich.
+
+--
+Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
+Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com
+libguestfs lets you edit virtual machines. Supports shell scripting,
+bindings from many languages. http://libguestfs.org