-The supermin appliance removes the kernel and all the executable
-libraries and programs from the appliance. That just leaves a
-skeleton of config files and some data files, which is obviously
-massively smaller than the normal appliance. At runtime we rebuild
-the appliance on-the-fly from the libraries and programs on the host
-(eg. pulling in the real /lib/libc.so, the real /bin/bash etc.)
-
-Although this process of rebuilding the appliance each time sounds
-slow, it turns out to be faster than using the prebuilt appliance.
-(Most of the saving comes from not compressing the appliance - it
-transpires that decompressing the appliance is the slowest part of the
-whole boot sequence). On my machine, a new appliance can be built in
-under a fifth of a second, and the boot time is several seconds
-shorter.
-
-The big advantage of the supermin appliance for distributions like
-Fedora is that it gets security fixes automatically from the host, so
-there is no need to rebuild the whole of libguestfs for a security
-update in some underlying library.
-
-There are several DISADVANTAGES:
-
-It won't work at all except in very narrow, controlled cases like the
-Fedora packaging case. We control the dependencies of the libguestfs
-RPM tightly to ensure that the required binaries are actually present
-on the host.
-
-Furthermore there are certain unlikely changes in the packages on the
-host which could break a supermin appliance, eg. an updated library
-which depends on an additional data file.
-
-Also supermin appliances are subjected to changes in the host kernel
-which might break compatibility with qemu -- these are, of course,
-real bugs in any case.