X-Git-Url: http://git.annexia.org/?p=virt-what.git;a=blobdiff_plain;f=virt-what.pod;h=156406ecc12c952a0be9c3daaa079cbebde499ce;hp=f2f1a3f0158dd2afa65a5ac9d3bcaa9c6a155210;hb=5453cf333745418a641374e19fd968519fd7de30;hpb=37f7b6e5f79d61ec4f8967f3de2ec63420aec894 diff --git a/virt-what.pod b/virt-what.pod index f2f1a3f..156406e 100644 --- a/virt-what.pod +++ b/virt-what.pod @@ -27,9 +27,38 @@ don't know about or cannot detect. =item B -This is Hyper-V. +This is Microsoft Hyper-V hypervisor. -Status: from MSDN description, not tested. +Status: confirmed by RWMJ + +=item B + +This is an IBM SystemZ (or other S/390) hardware partitioning system. +Additional facts listed below may also be printed. + +=item B + +This is Linux running directly on a IBM SystemZ hardware partitioning +system. + +This is expected to be a highly unusual configuration - if +you see this result you should treat it with suspicion. + +Status: not confirmed + +=item B + +This is Linux running directly on an LPAR on an IBM SystemZ +hardware partitioning system. + +Status: not confirmed + +=item B + +This is a z/VM guest running in an LPAR on an IBM SystemZ +hardware partitioning system. + +Status: confirmed by RWMJ using a Fedora guest running in z/VM =item B @@ -39,7 +68,12 @@ Status: contributed by Barış Metin =item B -This is KVM. +This guest is running on the KVM hypervisor using hardware +acceleration. + +Note that if the hypervisor is using software acceleration +you should I see this, but should see the C fact +instead. Status: confirmed by RWMJ. @@ -50,6 +84,13 @@ container. Status: contributed by Evgeniy Sokolov +=item B + +The guest is running inside Parallels Virtual Platform +(Parallels Desktop, Parallels Server). + +Status: contributed by Justin Clift + =item B The guest is running inside IBM PowerVM Lx86 Linux/x86 emulator. @@ -58,7 +99,7 @@ Status: data supplied by Jeffrey Scheel, not confirmed =item B -This is QEMU using software emulation. +This is QEMU hypervisor using software emulation. Note that for KVM (hardware accelerated) guests you should I see this. @@ -73,7 +114,8 @@ Status: contributed by Laurent Léonard =item B -This is Hitachi Virtualization Manager (HVM) Virtage logical partitioning. +This is Hitachi Virtualization Manager (HVM) Virtage +hardware partitioning system. Status: data supplied by Bhavna Sarathy, not confirmed @@ -91,13 +133,13 @@ Status: not confirmed =item B -The guest appears to be running on VMware. +The guest appears to be running on VMware hypervisor. Status: confirmed by RWMJ =item B -The guest appears to be running on Xen. +The guest appears to be running on Xen hypervisor. Status: confirmed by RWMJ @@ -119,15 +161,23 @@ This is a Xen guest fully virtualized (HVM). Status: confirmed by RWMJ -=item B +=back -This is a z/VM guest running on an IBM SystemZ mainframe. +=head1 EXIT STATUS -Status: confirmed by RWMJ using a Fedora guest running in z/VM. Not -tested whether this also works for Linux installed directly in an -LPAR. +Programs that use or wrap C should check that the exit +status is 0 before they attempt to parse the output of the command. -=back +A non-zero exit status indicates some error, for example, an +unrecognized command line argument. If the exit status is non-zero +then the output "facts" (if any were printed) cannot be guaranteed and +should be ignored. + +The exit status does I have anything to do with whether the +program is running on baremetal or under virtualization, nor with +whether C managed detection "correctly" (which is basically +unknowable given the large variety of virtualization systems out there +and that some systems deliberately emulate others). =head1 IMPORTANT NOTE